If a shipper sees compliance in its routing guide break down, it will be forced to buy capacity in the spot market, often at higher rates. If a market is decelerating tender rejections are falling , spot rates are likely to fall until they hit the market floor. The market floor is equivalent to the collective operating cost of carriers. Rates are unlikely to fall below this point. If a market is flat tender rejections are near zero , in the short-term there will be continued downward pressure on spot rates until rates hit the market floor.
If a flat market continues for more than a few months, contract rates are likely to fall towards the market floor.
If a market is strengthening tender rejections are increasing , there will be upward pressure on rates. There is no ceiling on rates, but if rates stay high for an extended period of time, new capacity will enter the market. SONAR tracks routing guide compliance by tracking tender rejections and other data to determine if routing guides are likely to break down in the near future.
This data is then compiled and compared against other data sets, including financial and operational data from hundreds of carriers, brokers and shippers. Using data derived from hundreds of operating and financial metrics of over carriers, we calculated the average operating cost of carriers across the market.
This is basically the cost it takes to operate a truck in the market. This is considered the base rate. Then we built an algorithm that multiplies the base rate against the tender rejection data to get the current market condition rate, using historical market spot rates. The market condition rate is then trained against the HAUL index to allow for individual market conditions.
Keep in mind that the rate for any given lane is determined by both the origin and destination; the price of a truck has as much to do with the attractiveness of certain destination markets as it does with the availability of trucks in a given origin market.
The rates adjust for seasonality variations in the model and other financial and operational components. By default admin is a local account. From here, click in the user's Tokens column to see the user's existing tokens, and either revoke existing tokens or generate new ones.
Once established, a token is the only credential needed to run an analysis. Tokens should be passed as the value of the sonar. When installing SonarQube, a default user with Administer System permission is created automatically:. If you changed and then lost the admin password, you can reset it using the following query:. If you've deleted admin and subsequently locked out the other users with global administrative permissions, you'll need to re-grant admin to a user with the following query:.
The way authorization is implemented in SonarQube is pretty standard. It is possible to create as many users and groups of users as needed.
The users can then be attached or not to multiple groups. The permissions grant access to projects, services, and functionalities. For manually-created users, login and password can be set at creation. Manually-created users can edit their passwords. During both user creation and edit, you can set an account's screen name, email address.
User login and email address will be implicitly recognized by the Issue Assignment feature as SCM accounts if applicable, but you can set additional SCM accounts explicitly. For that, see Creators permission below. Project visibility may be toggled between public or private. Making a project private hides its source code and measures from the Anyone group.
For both public and private projects, four different permissions can be set:. Note that permissions are not cumulative. For instance, if you want to be able to administer the project, you also have to be granted the Browse permission to be able to access the project which is the default for public projects.
Not knowing them might lead to not understand their needs and therefore not being close enough to deliver value. Despite the fact that we are always ready to answer questions on the mailing lists , the Sonar team wanted to be sure it knows well enough its users and their experience using the platform. That is why we recently made two polls and today I would like to share their results :.
Maybe it's good time for you to follow the mass and download latest version right now? As you probably know, we are working on some plugins for IDEs , which will help developers improve source code quality directly from their favorite development environment.
So, which is your favorite IDE? Thanks to Henri Gomez who's provided the following poll results about user experience in Sonar integration with Hudson : Which kind of Hudson job do you use? And last but not least, is your opinion about the Plugins Forge and about the commercial plugins. Which Sonar plugins do you use? Thus the most useful plugin in the opinion of users is the Technical Debt Plugin.
0コメント